What will you miss when this site closes?





192 votes ~ 6 comments

This site will turn read-only at the end of September 2017.

XML logo

Firefox vs Firefox ESR
Posted by nick0268 on Thu 2 Feb 2017 at 05:08
Tags: none.
Hello

For some time, Firefox ESR is used as default in Debian. However, the alleged advantages of this ESR version are continually overshadowed by the negative effects. The fact is, that Firefox ESR is statistically much more uncertain than the regular Firefox version. Especially with regard to safety gaps. A browser has never a fixed status, and is far more than only just fixing bugs, but just the advancement that adds novelties and enhancements, contributes significantly to security. A Firefox ESR is a fatal error. And at what price? When was the regular Firefox ever unstable or critical in terms of reliability? I have been a Firefox user for a very long time, but the default under Debian, Firefox-ESR, is absolutely incomprehensible. Apart from the particular problem of having to forego modern technologies that make web usage problematic. And simply loading the regular Firefox from the repository is not a solution, but only a superfluous workaround for a questionable standard. This also has no positive effect on new Debian users, which should be considered.

I am not the only one who wants the regular Firefox standard to be. And compared to Chromium, whose latest build-versions are always available and are often immature, such a thing in practice with Firefox ESR should not be available at all. How does that fit together?

 

Comments on this Entry

Re: Firefox vs Firefox ESR
Posted by Anonymous (188.146.xx.xx) on Thu 2 Feb 2017 at 15:55
"When was the regular Firefox ever unstable or critical in terms of reliability?"
I experienced a rather bad regression in the regular version.

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Re: Firefox vs Firefox ESR
Posted by Anonymous (5.28.xx.xx) on Tue 21 Mar 2017 at 22:40
Do you know mozilla.debian.net ?

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Re: Firefox vs Firefox ESR
Posted by Anonymous (2001:0xx:0xx:0xxx:0xxx:0xxx:xx) on Sun 4 Jun 2017 at 16:38
What positives and negatives? Sorry but this sounds like a semi rant without direction.

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Re: Firefox vs Firefox ESR
Posted by Anonymous (78.0.xx.xx) on Tue 12 Sep 2017 at 20:01

As a long time Windows (regular Firefox) and Linux (ESR) user, I can attest that Mozilla has been adding a lot of "features" lately that disable existing features as well as add-ons that rely on them, which is just about every useful add-on on the planet. Using ESR would mean that we at least delay the consequences of this. Furthermore I think it'd be a good idea to add Pale Moon, which is a much more stable (feature-wise) and more privacy-minded version of Firefox.

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]