Do you use let's encrypt?





8441 votes ~ 27 comments

 

XML logo

Here we go again:IPv6
Posted by Steve on Sat 15 Nov 2008 at 13:20

Assuming I've not messed up we have IPv6 support again.

This time via 6to4.

Only basic testing has been done, but I see from the server access log that a few IPv6 addresses have hit the site so I'll assume it works... until I'm told it is broken.

 

Comments on this Entry

Re: Here we go again:IPv6
Posted by gna (2001:0xx:0xx:0xxx:0xxx:0xxx:xx) on Tue 18 Nov 2008 at 13:13
[ View Weblogs ]
Can you place a "You're connected trough IPv6" somewhere? then the IPv6 visitor could also see it's working :)

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Re: Here we go again:IPv6
Posted by Steve (80.68.xx.xx) on Tue 18 Nov 2008 at 13:45
[ View Steve's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]

A good suggestion, thanks.

The subtitle "System Administration Tips and Resources" should include IPv6 if you're connected via IPv6 now.

Steve

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Re: Here we go again:IPv6
Posted by Alucard (2001:0xx:0xx:0xxx:0xxx:0xxx:xx) on Wed 19 Nov 2008 at 17:14
[ View Weblogs ]
Seems to be working here.

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Re: Here we go again:IPv6
Posted by Steve (2001:0xx:0xx:0xxx:0xxx:0xxx:xx) on Sun 30 Nov 2008 at 23:22
[ View Steve's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]

And now for me too!

Steve

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Re: Here we go again:IPv6
Posted by JulienV (2001:0xx:0xx:0xxx:0xxx:0xxx:xx) on Wed 24 Dec 2008 at 10:31
[ View Weblogs ]
Thanks to miredo, I could test ipv6 connection to this site. I can see the IPv6 tag in the subtitle, but not on some specific pages, like http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/621 (which is an article on miredo!)

Cheers,
Julien

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Re: Here we go again:IPv6
Posted by Steve (82.41.xx.xx) on Wed 24 Dec 2008 at 10:42
[ View Steve's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]

Ahhh that'll be a caching artifact. I'll have to track it down and fix it.

Steve

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Re: Here we go again:IPv6
Posted by philcore (2001:0xx:0xx:0xxx:0xxx:0xxx:xx) on Sat 6 Dec 2008 at 15:57
[ View Weblogs ]
yup. working for me.

phil

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Re: Here we go again:IPv6
Posted by Anonymous (201.242.xx.xx) on Sat 22 Nov 2008 at 03:19
The web ping interface works, the site responds, but I can't ping it from my machine in south america right now.

PING 2002:5910:a162::1(2002:5910:a162::1) 56 data bytes

--- 2002:5910:a162::1 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 3001ms

On a related note, is it me failing to do a proper search in the site or there are no articles about ipv6?

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Re: Here we go again:IPv6
Posted by Steve (82.41.xx.xx) on Sat 22 Nov 2008 at 10:30
[ View Steve's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]

IPv6 content here is minimal, the tag results are probably the simplest way to find things and you can see there is little stuff here.

Weird that ping fails, but if the site itself is up and running I'll not worry about it too much.

Steve

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Re: Here we go again:IPv6
Posted by Anonymous (201.242.xx.xx) on Sun 23 Nov 2008 at 00:35
Now the site is working ok for me. Regarding ipv6, for the curious, if you are behind NAT you just have to install miredo and that's all, in typical debian way.

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Re: Here we go again:IPv6
Posted by mahdi (2002:0xx:0xx:0xxx:0xxx:0xxx:xx) on Thu 4 Dec 2008 at 11:56
Looks like you (or me?) might have problem with PMTU discovery. I have 6to4 tunnel on my OpenWRT router that's connected to Internet via PPPoE - so it has mtu 1472 on its 6to4 interface. Unfortunately when I'm trying to reach your site via ipv6 from laptop connected to lan (that has of course mtu 1500) connection times out. Lowering laptop's interface mtu to 1472 allows the site to work again. As I don't have such problems when connecting to my servers (via ipv6 of course), nor ipv6.google.com, I'm guessing it might be something filtered on your side.

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]