You are not currently logged in. If you do not have a user account then please consider creating one and logging in before you post your comment. This will allow you to track replies to your comment, and take part in the site much more freely.

To add your comment, fill in all the boxes below and then preview it to make sure you're happy with the way that it looks.

This is the comment you were replying to, attached to the weblog GNOME and libpam-mount

#7 Re: GNOME and libpam-mount Posted by lool (88.166.xx.xx) on Mon 12 May 2008 at 18:09 I think it makes sense to group directives by type (auth or session for example) in the gdm and other configs; the issue is a consequence of the fact that common-pammount is a single file, would it be two files e.g. pammount-auth and pammount-session, we wouldn't be discussing this. So while I could shuffle lines around in the gdm PAM configs, I think we should avoid it as: - it would cause a conffile prompt for all systems where the gdm config was touched, probably more systems than systems with pammount - it would be less readable than the current one If this makes sense, then perhaps you should request that common-pammount be split in two files; on your side, you could simply copy-paste its contents in the proper place of the gdm PAM config in the mean time. What do you think? -- Loic Minier

Inappropriate comments will be removed.

Username:

Password:

[ Advanced Login ]

Register Account